I refuse to accept other people’s ideas of happiness for me. As if there’s a ‘one-size fits all’ standard for happiness.Kanye West, musician, 1977–
Station length and width have minimuns to work well; the influential factors are discussed in the following sections but in order to create proper circulation and wait area, one may compensate for the other, as usually right-of-way is an imposing restriction.
In order for multiple sub-stops to function properly, vehicles must be able to overtake buses stopped at sub-stops. In general, the absolute minimum distance required for one vehicle to pass another is one-half the bus length. For example, an 18-meter articulated vehicle requires at least nine meters of separation between docking bays. This minimum distance should only be used at stations with fairly low frequency, or where right of way constraint is a significant issue. Normally, systems require more space because:
Based upon this criteria, the minimum spacing should be approximately 1.7 times the length of the vehicle. In the case of an 18-meter articulated vehicle, this distance would be approximately 30 metres.
If the vehicle to platform interface does not utilise a boarding bridge, then greater precision is required to align the vehicle to the platform.
As stated in Chapter 7, section 7.6, while boarding bridges allow buses greater room for error in docking to the station and allow passengers greater confidence when boarding and alighting, there are a few disadvantages. The added cost of the boarding plate and the pneumatic system to operate it entails a modest increase in vehicle costs, as well as an increase in maintenance costs. As a moving part, the boarding bridge also introduces additional maintenance issues and the potential for malfunction. The deployment of the bridge itself takes about 1.5 seconds. Likewise, the retrieval of the boarding bridge at departure also requires about 1.5 seconds. While this deployment and retrieval roughly coincide with the opening and closing of the doors, they introduce a slight delay to the boarding and alighting process.
Unless saturation is very low, room should be left for a second vehicle to stop at each sub-stop, both to avoid queues interfering with the operation of the adjacent sub-stop and also to help disperse waiting passengers within the sub-stop. Generally, it is optimal to provide two boarding and alighting spaces, though in a few exceptional circumstances three queuing spaces maybe be optimal. Table 25.2 outlines the conditions favouring one or two bus docking bays.
Saturation level (X) From | Saturation level (X) To | No. of sub-stops | No. of lanes | Bus docking bays (vehicle lengths) | Extra queuing positions (vehicle lengths) | Total station length (metres) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 20% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
20 | 40% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 |
40% | 70% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 104 |
70% | 80% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 142 |
80% | 100% | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 156 |
100% | 140% | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 208 |
140% | 180% | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 260 |
180% | 200% | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 355 |
Notes:
As can be seen in Table 25.2, multiple sub-stops add considerable overall length to a station.
198 metres (3 sub-stops, 5 docking bays)
124 metres (2 sub-stops, 4 docking bays)
112 metres (2 sub-stops, 4 docking bays)
94 metres (2 sub-stops, 2 docking bays)
53 metres (1 sub-stop, 2 docking bays)
62 metres (1 sub-stop, 2 docking bays)
for passengers to enter and exit the area, and enough space for the infrastructure itself. If length is determined, and access is made by the extremes of the stations, which is a good idea for easy of access, one must leave a width for circulation and a with for the waiting area, lateral infrastructure may demand some width as well.
This reasonaing can be transformed in the following formulas (the concepts of vehicles flow on chapter 24 may assist).
Equation 1: Calculation of platform width
\[ W_p = W_i + W_u + W_c + W_{opp} \]
Where:
Equation 2: Width required for circulating passengers
\[ W_c = {\text{Flow}_\text{pax} \over \text{saturationflowperwidthunit}} \]
Where:
Equation 3: Area required for waiting passengers
\[ S_u = {Q_{u\text{pax}} \over Dw_\text{max}} \]
\[ S_{opp} = {Q_{opp\text{pax}} \over Dw_\text{max}} \]
Where:
Equation 4: Width required for waiting passengers
\[ W_{opp} = {S_{opp} \over L_{opp}} \]
\[ W_{u} = {S_{u} \over L_{u}} \]
Where:
Equation 5: Estimate of total boarding passengers at a sub-stop
\[ Q_\text{pax} = \sum_{i=1}^{N_\text{routes}}{Pb_i \over F_i} = \sum_{i=1}^{N_\text{routes}} {pbv_i} \]
Where:
A simplified application of this formulas, would be as follows, assuming an off-set station, given:
If we assume boarding passengers arrive at a constant rate at the platform, and the proportion of passengers boarding in each route being similar, as proposed:
\[ Q_\text{pax} = \sum_{i=1}^{N_\text{routes}}{Pb_i \over F_i} = \sum_{i=1}^{N_\text{routes}} {pbv_i} \]
\[ Q_\text{pax} = {250 \over 5} + {250 \over 5} + {250 \over 5}+{250 \over 5} = 200 \]
200 waiting passengers divided by 3 the maximum accepted occupancy of space: three passengers per square meter (\( Dw_max = 3 pax/m^2 \)) implies 66.6 square meters are required as waiting area.
\[ S _u = {Q_u\text{pax} \over Dw_\text{max}} \]
\[ S_u = {200 pax \over 3 pax/m^2} = 66.6 m^2 \]
The BRT vehicle is 18 meters long, if we consider 2 extra meter of lenght for the internal side of the station, corresponding to the space a BRT vehicle uses outside: To total 66.6m2 in 20 m of extention, the waiting area needs to be 3.33 8m wide (Wu = 3.33m).
\[ W_{u} = {S_{u} \over L_{u}} \]
\[ 3.33 {66_{u} \over 20_{u}} \]
The width for circulation of passengers coming and going from and to other platforms will be 2 meters
\[ W_c = {\text{Flow}_\text{pax} \over \text{basicpax saturationflowperwidthunit}} \]
\[ W_c = {4000 \over 2000} = 2m \]
And finally to total width of the station results in 6.33 metres.
\[ W_p = W_i + W_u + W_c + W_opp \]
\[ 1m + 3.33m + 2m + 0m = 6.33m \text{; add}\ 0.5m\ \text{shy distance} = 6.83m \]
Round up to 7.0m
Station height from floor to ceiling should be at least 3.5m in a partially enclosed station, and at least 4m in a fully enclosed station. Beyond these minimum dimensions, station heights can vary according to the particular design. An example of BRT station dimensions provided by architect Derek Trusler with ITDP for a study in Malaysia is provided in Figure 25.55.
Station and road cross-sections will vary according to the conditions of each urban corridor and the demand and operational characteristics of the system. However, the following general guidelines can be applied:
ITDP’s station section for Wangzhougang Station in Yichang, illustrated in Figure 25.57, is an example of the need to reduce the width of non-BRT lanes at the BRT station in order to retain in this case a minimum 5-meter BRT station width. Between stations, where space is less constrained, mixed traffic lanes are 3.5 meter, the bike lane 1.5 meter (plus a 0.5-meter divider), and the walkway 3.5 meter. At the station the mixed traffic lanes are reduced to 3.2 meter, the bike lane to 1 meter (without a divider), and the walkway to 3 meter. Yichang is a high-capacity BRT system. Reducing space for pedestrians should be the last resort as with customers going to and from the station, pedestrian traffic may be higher in these station areas.
Figure 27,58 provides an example of a cross-section for a medium capacity BRT system: the design in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Note that in the proposed cross-section between stations, mixed traffic has 7 meter of space per direction, which at the BRT station is reduced to 6 meter. Since BRT vehicles are stopping on both sides of the platform, the BRT lane width is also reduced to 3 meter at the station. A rendering of the same station is provided in Figure 25.59.
The following table lists typical cross section widths at BRT stations. It is organized from the outside-in (from the building line to the center line). Priority is shown for each element. Use the prioritization scheme to guide the assemblage of the cross-section.
– | Pedestrian Zone | 2 - 5.0m |
|
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paved Accessible Pedestrian Route | 2 - 3.0m |
|
3 | Bicycle parking | 2.0m |
|
2 | Trees and landscaping | 1.0m or wider |
|
3 | Pedestrian-bicycle buffer | 0.0 - 1.0m |
|
2 | Bicycle lane | 1.5 - 5.0m |
|
3 | Bicycle-auto buffer | 0.3 - 1.5m |
|
– | Auto parking | n/a |
|
4 | Auto lane | 2.7 - 3.3m |
|
– | Auto turn lane | n/a |
|
– | Auto lane shoulder | n/a |
|
2 | Auto-BRT buffer | 0.2 - 0.5m |
|
2 | BRT passing lane | 3.5m |
|
1 | BRT lane | 3.0 - 3.5m |
|
1 | BRT station | 5.0 - 10.0m |
|